On 18/06/12 10:13, Roberto Rosselli Del Turco wrote:
>> I'm not saying this is the best approach for your problem, but
>> it should
>> be doable with XSLT 2.0.
> Thanks a lot, I should have specified XSLT 1.0 since that's what
> I know.
I was going to suggest the same as Ron (when you have a hammer,
everything looks like a nail)... You should learn more about XSLT
2... it is just so much better for this kind of thing. IMHO it
repays the time spent learning about it.
Dr James Cummings, InfoDev
Oxford University Computing Services
University of Oxford