On 21/01/13 09:14, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2013, at 20:06, stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>
>> On 21/01/13 01:22, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>> How would we distinguish the bits you added from the bits which came from the TEI?
>> You don't need to. You use a statement such as "TEI materials are licensed under..." and not an explicit claim that everything in the file is a TEI material.
> true. do you fancy adding that to the relevant files? (Exemplars/tei_*.odd)
It turns out that there was already some proper licensing info in
Exemplars/tei_tite.odd, which I've made uniform across the rest.
It seems to work and hasn't broken anything in any way that Jenkins detects.