On 26/01/13 11:58, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2013, at 22:50, "stuart yeates" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> I would like to propose a new note on the definition of "<cRefPattern>":
>> There are no known implementations of cRefPattern, so it's usefulness is primarily theoretical. Reports of implementations are welcome on the TEI mailing list.
> Oh dear. If we start down that line, what's the definition of an implementation? And to how many other tags would it apply?
> Nice idea though.... Bring on the howling protests from the "there is no beast as a tei implementation" faction.
You're welcome to recast the note without term you find offensive, but
neglecting to warn newbie users of serious issues just because the
grey-beards have a terminological quandary is asking for TEI to become a
cul de sac.