LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for PED-EM-L Archives


PED-EM-L Archives

PED-EM-L Archives


PED-EM-L@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PED-EM-L Home

PED-EM-L Home

PED-EM-L  April 2014

PED-EM-L April 2014

Subject:

Re: Adult patients in the PED

From:

IOANNIS KOUTROULIS <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

IOANNIS KOUTROULIS <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:26:15 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (412 lines)

True but not board eligible for PEM though..I think we have to realize that
a PEM is primarily an ER doc (a pediatric subspecialist but like a peds
neurologist that gets training in adult neurology as well) and although
there are 2 routes to become a PEM, the result is the same..A PEM should be
able to run an ED and if needed to see adults..If not, then PEMs through
peds can be looked as second class citizens within the EM community..As an
EM trained doc can see kids, a PEM should be able to see adults..I
understand that we chose to do peds in order not to see adults but the ED
is a unique place and why not having the qualifications and be the one to
make the decision in the end? What I mean is that an EM residency is 3
years long and a PEM fellowship is 3 years long as well. Instead of having
so many research months, a PEM fellow should do more adult EM and be
qualified in the end to see all patients. Then ultimately a PEM can decide
to work in a children's hospital and see only kids or work in a general ED
and see everything..If the training is the problems the 3 years of PEM
fellowship are more than enough to get it!

My 2 cents..

Ioannis Koutroulis,MD

St Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia


On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Dr. Adam Friedlander <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> At least we're all in agreement that the most qualified docs for seeing
> whatever comes in the door are those trained at combined EM/Peds programs.
> :)
>
>
> Adam D. Friedlander, MD, FAAEM
> Nothside-Forsyth Emergency Department
> Northside Emergency Associates
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Don Zweig <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Sounds like adult em trained should not see peds if peds should not see
> > adult.
> >
> > From Don's fingers 2 u
> >
> > > On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:54 AM, Dale Woolridge <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Very good points Dr. Flood. I did although want to make one
> > correction...
> > >
> > > The EM RRC requires a minimum of 16% 'pediatric experience'. They
> > equate a dedicated pediatric month (PedED, PICU, Peds Wards etc) to 4%.
> > This means that the bare minimum of pediatric exposure for board
> > eligibility through ABEM is an equivalent of 4 months. (sorry for
> > splitting hairs but wanted to make sure the correct info went out). Few
> EM
> > programs are at the minimum and most are comfortably in excess.
> > >
> > > Personal opinion is that I don't think allowing a minimum of 16% is
> > enough since national studies have shown that an ~27% of ED volume is
> > minors (<17 yo) most of which are seen in general ED's. (emphasizing the
> > need to get solid ped training to our primarily adult care colleagues).
> > >
> > > Great discussion string. Thx to the group.
> > > Dale
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Discussion List [
> > [log in to unmask]] on behalf of Robert Flood [[log in to unmask]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:30 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: Adult patients in the PED
> > >
> > > Dear Dr. Chavda:
> > >
> > > With respect to PEM trained physicians, it is a scope of practice
> issue,
> > as
> > > defined by your medical staff credentials committee and your own
> personal
> > > comfort level in managing adults.
> > >
> > > Still, since all PEM fellowships require at least 2-3 months of adult
> > > experience, one could argue that all PEM Fellowship Trained physicians
> > have
> > > had adult experience and expertise. After all, our Adult EM trained
> > > colleagues are required to do only 3 months of pediatrics in a 3 year
> > > residency, and then are privileged to care for children who present to
> > EDs
> > > throughout the country.
> > >
> > > Most malpractice coverage is all encompassing for all ED Emergencies so
> > > that you are indeed covered to manage all patients under the EMTALA
> > > standard. Still, you might want to check with your specific carrier if
> > you
> > > have any concerns.
> > >
> > > Whether PEM physicians CAN care for adults is not so much in question
> as
> > > much as SHOULD PEM physicians care for these older patients, and I am
> not
> > > sure you will get a clear answer from the PEM community.
> > >
> > > Bob Flood
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Chavda, Kamal <
> > [log in to unmask]
> > >> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Dr. Flood,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The question is not about patient showing up to a pediatric ED. That
> > part
> > >> is clear---If they show up all they need is screening exam and
> transfer
> > >> them appropriately.
> > >>
> > >> The question was --- Hospitals where the pediatric and adult ED are
> > >> adjacent to each other (separated by doors) the management at several
> > >> institutions wants pediatric ED to take some of adult ED patients to
> > ease
> > >> the flow and waiting times etc ( Not to mention- improve customer
> > service
> > >> satisfaction- PG score)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I had to do that sometimes out of courtesy for my adult ED colleagues
> > when
> > >> they got slammed ( did so very reluctantly and cherry picked patients)
> > >>
> > >> Other than not wanting to see adults as we chose to do pediatrics, my
> > >> question would be.......
> > >>
> > >> If one is PEM trained ---What does your malpractice insurance say in
> > >> terms of age? Does it specify age? In the event of a law suit could
> > you be
> > >> on your own?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> KKC,MD
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________________
> > >> From: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Discussion List [
> > >> [log in to unmask]] on behalf of Robert Flood [
> [log in to unmask]]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:02 PM
> > >> To: [log in to unmask]
> > >> Subject: Re: Adult patients in the PED
> > >>
> > >> Hi everyone:
> > >>
> > >> Regardless of the age range you care for in your ED, this entire
> > >> conversation really focuses on two issues: Scope of Practice and
> EMTALA.
> > >>
> > >> EMTALA reigns supreme on all issues as it pertains to EM. As a
> > physician in
> > >> an ED, you must provide stabilization to the best of your hospital's
> and
> > >> your personal capabilities. Since the training, expertise and
> > experience of
> > >> EM physicians vary greatly, everyone should keep these simple
> > principles in
> > >> mind.
> > >>
> > >> As such, I give the following advice to my staff:
> > >>
> > >> 1) All adult patients who present for care in our ED must have an
> EMTALA
> > >> screening examination.
> > >> 2) The extent of that screening examination is determined by your
> > >> hospital's and your personal level of comfort of managing that patient
> > to
> > >> the point of Discharge or Transfer.
> > >>
> > >> For those who feel really uncomfortable managing adult patients, the
> > extent
> > >> of the medical screening will be much less than for say me, who
> trained
> > in
> > >> adult medicine.
> > >>
> > >> Lets not make this more complicated than it needs to be.
> > >>
> > >> Just my two cents.
> > >>
> > >> Bob Flood
> > >> Division Director, PEM
> > >> Cardinal Glennon, St. Louis
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Marjan Askar <
> [log in to unmask]
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I just wanted to point out that suturing a 30 year old May not be
> > >>> different than the 15 year old, but the bottom line is that those of
> us
> > >> who
> > >>> chose to do a pediatric emergency fellowship following a pediatric
> > >>> residency, are PEDIATRIC sub specialists.
> > >>> We CHOOSE not to see adults .
> > >>> Same argument goes for a heart surgeon performing general surgery .
> > Are
> > >>> the able to and trsined? Yes
> > >>> They CHOOSE not to.
> > >>> This issue comes up where I work all the time.
> > >>> In the era of see as many patients as quickly as you can and keep
> > >> patients
> > >>> satisfied , physician satisfaction with what they do is forgotten .
> > >>> I simply CHOOSE to take care of kids. This is what satisfies me.
> > >>>
> > >>> Marjan Askar
> > >>> Lake Forest, IL
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 21, 2014, at 7:46 PM, "Linzer, Jeffrey F" <
> [log in to unmask]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Not to drag up too many old issues, but PEM's are emergency
> physicians
> > >>> first. Yes, everyone who came up the peds track did only four months
> of
> > >>> adult time and that won't make you an expert in figuring out whether
> to
> > >>> start TPA on that 52 year-old who is having an evolving stroke or
> not.
> > >>> However, I think doing a laceration repair on a relatively healthy 40
> > >>> year-old isn't that much different than a 15 year-old.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That said, the only "legal" issue is what services you are
> > credentialed
> > >>> by the hospital to perform (other than the occasional emergency
> > surprise
> > >>> that may so up at your door). If you work in a dual ED (adults and
> kids
> > >> in
> > >>> the same basic area), then the hospital is responsible for making
> sure
> > >> you
> > >>> are qualified to perform/provide services to certain patients. The
> > >>> breakdown of peds care ending at 15, 17, 20 or 25 is purely
> artificial
> > >> and
> > >>> based on your specific hospital's policies. In fact the AAP
> recognizes
> > >>> "young adults" (to age 26) under the purview of pediatrics (Guiding
> > >>> principles for managed care arrangements for the health care of
> > newborns,
> > >>> infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics
> > >>> 2013;132;e1452).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So with that said, as long as the hospital has said your are
> qualified
> > >>> to perform a service (and your malpractice carrier agrees) than you
> can
> > >> go
> > >>> ahead and provide the service.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Just my 2₵
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jeff
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jeffrey Linzer Sr., MD, FAAP, FACEP
> > >>>> Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine
> > >>>> Emory University School of Medicine
> > >>>> Associate Medical Director for Compliance
> > >>>> EPG/Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
> > >>>> Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Discussion List [mailto:
> > >>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lisa A Drago
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 3:13 PM
> > >>>> To: [log in to unmask]
> > >>>> Subject: Adult patients in the PED
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Recently our adult colleagues have been requesting the PEM docs see
> > >>> young adults ( under 30) when their volume becomes unbearable. Any
> PEM
> > >> docs
> > >>> seeing young adults in your practice and legally how are you handling
> > >> this
> > >>> (separate hospital privileges?)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask]
> > <mailto:
> > >>> [log in to unmask]> with the message: info PED-EM-L The URL
> > for
> > >>> the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
> of
> > >>>> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged
> > >>>> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> > >>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> > distribution
> > >>>> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> > >>>> prohibited.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> > >>>> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> > >>>> original message (including attachments).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with
> > >> the
> > >>> message: info PED-EM-L
> > >>>> The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > >>>> http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> > >>>
> > >>> For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with
> > the
> > >>> message: info PED-EM-L
> > >>> The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > >>> http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> > >>
> > >> For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with
> the
> > >> message: info PED-EM-L
> > >> The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > >> http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Visit us at www.UHhospitals.org.
> > >>
> > >> The enclosed information is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for
> > the
> > >> use of the addressee only. University Hospitals and its affiliates
> > disclaim
> > >> any responsibility for unauthorized disclosure of this information to
> > >> anyone
> > >> other than the addressee.
> > >>
> > >> Federal and Ohio law protect patient medical information, including
> > >> psychiatric_disorders, (H.I.V) test results, A.I.Ds-related
> conditions,
> > >> alcohol, and/or drug_dependence or abuse disclosed in this email.
> > Federal
> > >> regulation (42 CFR Part 2) and Ohio Revised Code section 5122.31 and
> > >> 3701.243 prohibit disclosure of this information without the specific
> > >> written consent of the person to whom it pertains, or as otherwise
> > >> permitted
> > >> by law.
> > >
> > > For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with
> the
> > message: info PED-EM-L
> > > The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > > http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> > >
> > > For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with
> the
> > message: info PED-EM-L
> > > The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > > http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> >
> > For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with the
> > message: info PED-EM-L
> > The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> > http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
> >
>
> For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with the
> message: info PED-EM-L
> The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
> http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html
>

For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with the message: info PED-EM-L
The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is:
                 http://listserv.brown.edu/ped-em-l.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager