Hi Thomas, hi list,
* Thomas A. Schmitz dixit [2014-06-27 11:58]:
> I hope this question isn't too basic: the text I'm currently working
> on (Lucian) has a traditional sectioning system which I need to adopt.
> Since I want to mark it up for lexical analysis and indexing, the
> cleanest method appears to be <div> elements. Numbered sections may
> appear as independent paragraphs, indented in modern editions, or the
> numbering may occur in mid-paragraph. I can control this with an @rend
> My problem is that modern editions also have indented "logical"
> paragraphs (i.e. the editor wants to mark a logical division), which
> may overlap these numbered sections. They are thus unnecessary for
> purposes of analysis or indexing, but I still need to encode them. I
> looked at the documentation, and the best solution seemed to be an
> empty element (ch. 20.2), but neither <pb/> nor <cb/> nor <milestone/>
> is quite what I'm looking for. What would you suggest for this case?
We have a similar problem, I think. (Some of) our texts have explicit
structural sections, typographical sections and logical sections that
happen to begin sometimes in the middle of a sentence. After some
discussions, we have settled for a mixture of <div>, <p> and
<milestone/> elements like below.
(the asterisk on the next-to-last line of the first scan indicates the
beginning of a logical argument-section (which is referenced in the
"SUMMA." list at the beginning of the quaestio), beginning in the middle
of a typographical paragraph, which is one of several such paragraphs in
the structural section marked by heading/lettrine initials etc.)
For these pages, our markup would look something like this (I have
purged unnecessary stuff):
<div type="question" xml:id="Vol01Lect01Q01" n="1">
An in Ecclesia sit aliqua dignitas, vel authoritas ecclesiastica, praeter potestatem civile.</head>
<p>PRIMUM oportet, sicut de nomine Ecclesiae fecimus, ita quid per nomen
Potestatis intelligatur, declarare. Neq; <milestone unit="article" n="1" xml:id="Vol01Lect01Q01Art01"/> enim
omnino idem videtur esse potestas, quod potetia.
<pb facs="facs:W0013-0020" n="17" xml:id="facs_W0013-0020"/>
Nec materiam siquidem, neq; sensus, imò nec intellectum, aut volutatem potestates, sed
potentias vocamus. Cotrà <milestone unit="article" n="2" xml:id="Vol01Lect01Q01Art02"/> autem magistratus,
sacerdotia, et omnino imperia potestates
<p>[Perhaps another typographical paragraph]</p>
<div type="question" xml:id="Vol01Lect01Q02" n="2">
So far, we are just almost through with our conceptual work defining our
markup and do not yet have much practical experience with this approach,
but perhaps you find it useful...
Dr. Andreas Wagner
Project "The School of Salamanca"
Academy of Sciences and Literature, Mainz
and Institute of Philosophy
Goethe University Frankfurt
IGF HP 25 / R 2.455
60629 Frankfurt am Main
Tel. +49 (0)69/798-32774
Fax +49 (0)69/798-32794