Hi, Patrik, I sincerely doubt that whatever I do with this conlang idea
will prove anything at all.
For those interested in this thread, when I talked about an illogical,
difficult, obdurate language, I was thinking about the grammar. One can, of
course, create a phonology that is extremely hard to pronounce, full of
tongue-twisters, and clusters of clicks and implosives and all that. And,
it is also possible to make a difficult orthography that hampers
readability. But I wasn't talking about that stuff.
As I've mulled this over more, I've realized that I don't understand what I
meant either! Originally, I was thinking along the lines that any morphemic
marking would be UNrelated to the referred event or the speaker/listener
context. As Virginia said, though, you could still crunch through it and
come up with an utterance that was consistent with whatever silly syntactic
rules apply (e.g. I am having a bad hair day (or for me, a no hair day,
like usual), and my tooth aches, but I had hotcakes for breakfast, and I do
love hotcakes --> use ablaut form #3A). But is that actually ILlogical, or
just plain silly?
Your comments and musings are appreciated. Keep them coming.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Patrik Austin <[log in to unmask]>
> Hi guys,
> I'm glad to see I've been a source of inspiration :)
> My idea with "Reduced Natural Grammar" VS predicate logic is to show that
> all languages are basically logical systems. So the way I see it, an
> illogical language would be an unlanguage, although I'm about to prove
> myself wrong.
> The core logical variable in any language is probably positive/negative. A
> professor of linguistics once told me language has no logic. This means
> that if I tell you I'll pay you a tenner for washing my laundry, I may
> afterwards point out that there's no way to examine the truth value of what
> I said. The judge may disagree.
> However, there is a language where the word 'no' is infamously ambiguous;
> this is sometimes called Womanese. Here's an attempt for a grammar:
> Again, some people might disagree. A friend of mine, a transsexual woman,
> wrote the song "Ei!" (No!) for her punk band. The words go something like
> "No is no is no is no is no is no.... Shall I bend it from wire or do I
> need to kick your butt to make you understand what the word 'no' means?"
> Although someone might argue that even transsexual women never become
> fully fluent in Womanese. Anyway Jeffrey - don't give up on your project.
> Whatever you do, it's likely to prove my point :)