> On 22 Feb 2015, at 19:07, Matthew Davis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I’m wondering if the solution to that isn’t to have a database of tei snippets and proposed corrections. When an editor signs off, that proposed correction could then be rendered into well-formed P5 XML and merged back into the parent document.
if the EEBO TCP project had the resources to pay editors in into the future, we wouldn’t be having this discussion….
Chief Data Architect
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431