Am 24.08.2015 um 11:01 schrieb Jack Bowers:
> To (preemptively) stave off any possible implications that <link> just be used and <relation> deprecated, I think <relation> is important because of the semantics of it’s attributes (@active; @mutual; @ passive), the implications of which are more specific than <link>... I think <relation> is an important element in bridging TEI with RDF ontological data as well (though I know of course that’s not the only way)...
That's why I suggested <linkGrp> instead of only <link>: in <linkGrp>
you can specify active/mutual/passive in the @targFunc attribute.
Conversion to RDF should work fine.
Martin de la Iglesia
Metadata and Data Conversion
Göttingen State and University Library
Papendiek 14 (Historical Building, Room 1.602)
+49 551 39-14070 (Tel.)
+49 551 39-3468 (Fax)
[log in to unmask]