>> <lem>standard reading<add hand="#h1" place="above"><metamark
>> <rdg hand="#h1" rend="margin">alternate reading<metamark
>> function="variant" rend="ṭa"/></rdg>
>> What I am especially unsure about is:
>> * The position of the metamark entries as children of the lem/rdg.
> I think it is well marked up as a child of <add>
>> * The @rend on rdg (abusing @rend here for @place).
> Mmmh I’d prefer to have an <add place=””> within the <rdg> which will also match the fact that the <metamark> is within an <add>
If the corrector/commentator (h1) is defined as a witness in its own
right you don't have to indicate neither place nor the fact that reading
is an addition. Both could be generally described in the listWit within
witness. But I understand you want to combine a critical text version
with a document-centered transcription all in one document.
As for the categorisation of the reading, what about an @type="ṭa" on rdg?
Or @ana="ṭa" on metamark?
>> Dr. Frederik Elwert
>> Digital Humanities Coordinator
>> Center for Religious Studies
>> Ruhr-University Bochum
>> Universitätsstr. 90a
>> D-44780 Bochum
>> Phone +49(0)234 32-23024