shows clearly that <oRef> is not empty.
On 15/06/16 18:24, Toma Tasovac wrote:
> I’m pretty sure oRef is not supposed to be empty, so there is no reason why you shouldn’t be able to use it as a replacement for oVar. But let somebody else confirm this please.
>> 15.06.2016., в 18.18, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> написал(а):
>> Dear All,
>> I am labouring through the very complex dictionary entries of Basnage de Beauval and oVar does a useful job. Insofar as it is now deprecated, what has been thought of to replace it when dealing with part of speech variations?
>> I have been told of the beauties of oRef, but it is still empty and thus does not do the job.
>> Would it not be nice to link what is deprecated to a replacement possibility?
>> Best wishes