Ah, but this is misrepresenting Torsten's question. He asked if
profileDesc relates to the *text* of the source document, not to the
physical source document itself. Lou and I argued over this in October
2011. While we agreed that profileDesc is not about the physical source
document, in the end we admitted that profileDesc is ambiguous on the
matter that Torsten raises. --Kevin
On 6/20/16 8:54 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> <creation> is intended to hold information about the creation of the
> TEXT, not the document/s attesting it. For example, suppose we encode
> the text of a poem known to have circulated in manuscript form during
> the 16th century, but of which no copy text survives earlier than the
> 20th. The profileDesc/creation might talk about the fact that the poem
> was created in the 16th c; the sourceDesc should describe the 20th c.
> source document/s from which we made the encoding; the revisionDesc
> should describe the history of the encoded version itself./s
> This seems quite unambiguous to me in the current description of
> <creation> in the Guidelines, (probably because I wrote it).
> On 20/06/16 15:34, Torsten Schaßan wrote:
>> Dear Matthew, dear all,
>> this is something I always "struggle" with: Does the description
>> within <profileDesc> relate to the text of the TEI file or to the text
>> of the document represented, i.e. described, transcribed etc, in the
>> TEI file?