The actions you describe fit with what we do, but we're doing that at 220V.
Do you have anything you can forward/link in terms of evidence/data as to which is the voltage level above which one should act differently (more work-up/observation) and why?
Thanks in advance!
From: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Chamberlain, James <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 03 December 2017 19:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Low voltage superficial electrical burns
Household sockets are 110 volt and are rarely harmful. I would check for exit site and if none, assume local injury. If forearm or arm are tender, consider rhabdomyolysis from 60-hertz induced muscular tetanus.
If 220 volt, I would do more work up and observation.
For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with the message: info PED-EM-L
The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is: