I don't know if there is a *reason* for these discrepancies, but
suggesting a fix is on my plate, something I am hoping to work on
soon enough for Council to discuss in its January meeting. See
> I just noticed a difference between <place> on the one hand and
> <person> and <org> on the other that I find rather peculiar: the
> order of the children of <place> seems more rigid than in <person>
> and <org>, to the effect that e.g.
> <person><idno/><persName/></person> and
> <org><idno/><orgName/></org> are allowed, but
> <place><idno/><placeName/></place> isn't (while
> <place><placeName/><idno/></place> is perfectly fine). Is there are
> reason for that?