Are you nuts?
You're holding a pretty high standard to something that's -- by all outward
appearances -- totally whacked. How else do you explain a document that asks
how orderlies are worked into the PEM training program?
And if they don't care/know which 150 patients they want, a number that was
arrived at in a thoroughly logical way, after all, why should we?
In a message dated 9/15/98 8:53:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
> The following is not logical. 150 consecutive admissions to the ED is
> different from 150 consultations
> is different from 150 admissions. The RRC will be comparing apple, oranges
> and bananas. If that is
> definitely acceptable I guess we will each utilize what optimizes our
> applications but still does not
> make sense. Thanks.
> George Foltin
For more information, send mail to [log in to unmask] with the message: info PED-EM-L
The URL for the PED-EM-L Web Page is: