On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, James Chandler wrot:
> Don rote:

> Of course, choosing the context cleverly, as you have done here, will seem
> to disprove the point.  If, instead of 'konkurso', you had chosen something
> which could conceivably run, say 'hundo', then 'kura hundo' could indeed be
> understood in two ways: 1. a running dog (that is running at the moment),

COULD be understood in this way according to what rule?
WHO would understand it in this way?

Now I'll stop posting on this topic, since talking at the wind gives more

P. Erplesso

Shteletiston oni batas, shtelegiston oni shatas.