Print

Print


In a message dated 2000/05/04 10:18:43 PM,Lijesh wrote:

>In my opinion, with our diversity, _Indian_ could and should only imply
>living in India or being part of India, so it would include almost anything.
>And so the concept Un-Indian would probably be meaningless.
>

    Considering that Hinduism itself is quite pluralistic, it just seems most
applicable that _India-ness_ or _Bharatiyatha_  would be most diverse
(even, perversely, non-Hindu & even anti-Hindu).

    zHANg