> Dan Sulani wrote: > > On 25 May, DaW wrote: > > >Now I'll cut to the chase. Should languages be split according to > >political/ethnic and religious/sectarian divisions, even though the > >languages on each side of the boundary are highly mutually intellegible? > > As someone once said: > "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy." > :-) > Or a lobby group withing a country with a liberal government. -- Carlos Th By other definition: language is what you believe you speak and some people around you agree.