Print

Print


In a message dated 2000/06/11 01:06:44 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

>What about the -er- other activity necessary for the preservation of
>the species? Are they as torpid as pandas in that respect?
>I would have thought algae depended on dampness rather than lack of motion.
>The problem with 'sloth' lies in the moral implications of 'sloth', not in
>its root meaning. Calling it a 'slow (creature)' would be accurate and
>non-derogatory.

    Bravo, theophilus88