On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Tero Vilkesalo wrote: [snip] > That brings to my mind that conlangs could theoretically have a case for > virtually anything. How do you people see this? If the conlang uses cases, we > could indicate an important expression in an artificial case. [snip] I remember talking about this once: you could have a conlang that uses suffixes for case markings, and then have a way of constructing new case suffixes to derive new meanings. Then you'll have a theoretically infinite number of cases :-) T -- Roasting my brains over a slow fire. Please do not interrupt this process.