Print

Print


Kenji Schwarz wrote:
>> << >19.) A conjunction "and" (or a word with a
>> broader usage subsuming the
>> domain
>> >of "and")
>>
>> - Why a separate word? Why any marking at all? >>
>>
>>     Is there any natural language without one?
>
>Manchu, for one.  (I realize I always trot it out as
>an example, but it's been a few months/years since
>last time, so I hope you'll ignore the
>predictability).

I'm curious and don't recall seeing it previously.  How does it work (in 25
words or less :-)  )?.  Increasingly, I find that "and" is mostly unncessary
in Kash......