Print

Print


On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:58:46 +0200, Christophe Grandsire
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>En réponse à D Tse <[log in to unmask]>:
[...]
>> Anyway, wasn't it agreed upon a while ago that things like conlangs
>> are open-ended and can't really be completed?
>>
>
>In lexicon it's true. But grammars are systems, and I think you can
complete a
>grammar. Of course, you can always refine some points, especially if your
>language has exceptions. But in general, you can complete a grammar.

Does there exist such thing as A Complete Grammar of English, I wonder? ;)


Basilius