Print

Print


>From: "Donald J. HARLOW"
>>Yes. That is certainly true.
>>
>> > Obviously, Esperanto does not address your second point;
>> > it reduces the number of words to be learned (pace Leo et
>> > al), but does nothing about reducing the size of those to
>> > be learned in order to increase thinking speed. But is an
>> > increase in thinking speed (a) possible or (b) even
>> > desirable?
Answer: A linguist read the time table of math for 42 seconds in English and
for 30 seconds in Chinese. I think, at the end of 30th second the two
readers will have different idea in mind.And I don't reckon they have the
sam thinking speed.
Su Cheng Zhong



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp