Print

Print


Yes, I guess the central issue is inkjet 'archive' quality is a recent
technology.  Luckily, laserprinters by default are more archive-able ...
but not very useful for color imaging.


At 12:00 AM 1/10/2002 -0500, Automatic digest processor wrote:
>Date:    Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:02:43 +1100
>From:    Poe Lim <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Digital Photo Printing
>
>
> From the link to PCW, it would appear that the normal Epson and Canon are
>comparable in longevity; only one better is the Epson PS2000, which is
>probably excessive, and unlike the Canon doesn't have seperate ink tanks.
>
>Cheers,
>Poe Lim
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
> > I did a brief exchange with archivists at the US National Archives for
> > complimentary reasons, here's the response:



Warm regards,


Marv