Print

Print


----- Original Message -----
From: "Padraic Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: English backwards


> --- Jake X <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > .backwards transcribed be not would themselves words
> > the ,approach my iN
>
> Ah? So, you're reading it THIS way? -->-->--> such
> that "backwards" is the first word read, and "in" is
> the last word read? Intresting.
Yeah that was the idea... but at the moment I cheat and have to translate
both ways because I can't really think that way.... is that even
grammatically possible for construction?
> > .written it's order the in read when ,OVS it'S
> > .backwards reading without
> > ,way that it read to was idea mY  .order word
> > relearn actually tO
> >
> > Jake
>
> Padraic.
Jake