En réponse à bnathyuw <[log in to unmask]>: > > come on pristophe, can't we have the intonation as > well ( given it's so regular in french ) ? > Because it was so regular, I didn't have to add the intonation ;)) . It's completely contained into the stress mark. > [sE.la.'vi_H sE.la.'gER_H sE.la.,pOm(_H)[log in to unmask]] I wouldn't put _H on [pOm]. The secondary accent is so small there anyway... > [,&s 'lA:f _ ,&s 'wO: _ ,&s p@'t&I?@z 'Ini?] > Is *that* your dialect?!! No wonder it took me years to begin to understand British English!!! (American English is easy in comparison! :)) ) Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.