On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Andreas Johansson wrote:

> Quoting Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>:
> > In Swedish, would it make se nse to say that syllable breaks were phonemic
> > and length of neither consonants nor vowels was? So a (hypothetical) word
> > like fori would be /fu.ri/ and forri would be /fur.i/? I'm probably
> > showing my  ignorance on the matter here though :) And the fact that I
> > don't know Swedish :)
> You'd get into trouble analyzing pairs like _dam_ [dA:m] "lady" and _damm_
> [dam:] "dust; dam".

I knew there was going to be some problem, otherwise someone else would've
thought about it.

Tristan                  <[log in to unmask]>

Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
                -- Snoopy