Costentin Cornomorus wrote: > > >I think it does change in ways CL didn't. Read >good literature from the late 20th century and >from the middle 19th - there's a good bit of >change. Very little of it's underlying grammar; I >think it's mostly style and lexicon. > > > Is it possible that, not being native speakers of Latin, we are merely less perceptive of analogous stylistical differences. Incidentally, 10 of the words in this message derive from Latin. That's just under one third. Scary.