--- Philippe Caquant <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >
This is exactly what I think too, so I'm happy not
> to
> be the only one !
> It is evident that depending whether you're male or
> female, upper, mid or lower class, having a flu or a
> cough, living in a city, in the country or abroad,
> younger or older, lazy or not, excited or not,
> healthy
> or sick, living in 1953 or 2003, just coming from
> the
> dentist's or chewing a gum, or whatever, you may
> pronounce the same word a thousand different ways,
> and
> yet in most cases you still will get understood.

If someone came up to me while at work (the bistro at
Ikea Richmond) and asked for a [p_hA(:)p] or a [p_hQp]
or similar, I would have little difficulty
understanding them. Not none; 'pop' simply isn't a
word used by Australians. But when a customer came in
the other week asking for a 'pup' (that is, what I
heard as 'pup'), I really had no idea what to give

> So this is an endless and useless quest, phonology
> being the most external part of the language. When
> an
> engineer wants to build a car, he doesn't spend five
> years thinking of the paint colour of it, or on the
> exact form of the rear mirror.

Well, I guess it's up to you, but the phonology
dictates what is possible for the grammar (no voiced
stops? Can't voice stops for the past tense of verbs


Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.