Print

Print


Quoting J Y S Czhang <[log in to unmask]>:

>     I am of the opinion that a conlanger's methodical morphosyntactic
> approach is the only way to go about creating a realistic auxlang worth
> considering
> (or at least "neat")- and it seems the general and mutual consensus here is
> that a pidgin-creole type auxlang-conlang is prob'ly the best bet and/or the
> most
> fun ;) If any one happens to think otherwise - partly or wholly, please post
> an explanatory rebuttal - this could be interesting... hehe...

Orthodox Auxlangism has yet to convince me that ease of learning should be a
priority in the design of an international language.

                                                       Andreas