On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:25:49 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>2004-07-01 kl. 17.16 skrev Jacques Dehée:
>>> As I have been saying with the tenacity of a drunk Swiss cuckoo-clock:
>>> If the language cannot be understood by a sizable number of
>>> non-initiated speakers (something like Interlingua or Occidental) then
>>> there has got to be lots of money or motivation to support it.
>>> Kjell R
>> Of course !
>> And that is precisely the purpose of my double majority method
>> (number of speakers x number of languages) ! ! !
>Do you think you could demonstrate what such a language might might
>look like. Just a short text will do. What I would appreciate is that
>the persons behind such a language would provide records, so that one
>could follow how they have arrived to one decision and not another. Or
>perhaps better: to describe the methode used, so that everyone, given
>the methnod were known, could recreate the langauge.
>In fact Poul Moth who first introduced Interlingua in Denmark published
>his first little dictionary of Interlingua just knowing about the
>method used and having acces to some rather short texts. You could cast
>a glance at where I think there is a
>description about it.
>An example that might indicate what I am driving at would be the
>"Kompleta detalosa gramatiko de la lingua internaciona Ido". There you
>can often see why the people behind Ido decided to go for one word and
>not another.
>All the best!
>Kjell R

Previously collecting immense data from 36 languages,

I'll be personally ready in 2007 !

But my method may be applied or adapted by anybody before,

preferably by a European Union commission.