Print

Print


On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:43:01 +0300, Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Several years ago I tried to apply this approach to several language
> groups in Europe: North-Germanic, Slavic, Romance.

Those are boring; everyone bases their conlang on those.

I wonder whether anyone's made a pan-Semitic or pan-Uralic or
pan-Turkic conlang. Or pan-Amerind (or pan-[some Amerind family]), for
that matter. Or even pan-[Australian Aboriginal languages].

Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>