Print

Print


> Sapir-Worf could not possibly be true. If it were,
> we'd still be banging rocks together, if that.

What was the reason for this? Was the list too quiet for you? Those of
us who believe in the SW hypothesis, even in it's mildest form, could
come back with a myopic view of Chomsky's transformational grammar.
And neither side will change it's mind because of some argument here.