Print

Print


On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 23:55, Lou's Laptop wrote:

> Yes, that's correct. It was generally felt that it would be sensible to 
> make the content model less general than model.phrase, which permits 
> (for example) things like bits of verse lines, editorial corrections, 
> linguistic analyses... which surely don't belong inside a bibliographic 
> description.

Unless you're encoding a printed bibliography.

///Peter