Hi bad boys,

My messages concerning the greatest challenge ever mentioned

in AUXLANG, that's to say a dictionary of 40,000 words of 

Collateral Interlingua, the most advanced auxlang creation,

are very important to show the endless intolerance of esperantists,

fanatic obscurantists, lost for Civilization.

Messages concerning esperanto are welcome in esperanto sites,

irrelevant here.




On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:30:33 GMT, James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>The Esperantists can, if they like, continue indefinitely to bury their
>heads in the sand and stifle all rational debate about the possible
>shortcomings of the prescriptions of the Fundamento.  That is, at least, 
>option that remains open to them for the time being. We will carry on
>building up other movements, other languages, discussing, reasoning,
>listening, while they enjoy their few thousand-strong movement.  After 
>even Espist sociologists acknowledge that Espists are in general more
>interested in the Esp movement than in the question of an IL.
>If they do so, however, they risk ruining all prospects for mass adoption 
>any IL, possibly forever.  If they want global pidgin English on a 
>basis, let me just say that at the moment they are going the right way 
>it.  If I wanted to further the cause of English by disabling any moves
>towards an artifical lang, I would want to create an Esperanto movement 
>a language as imperfect as Esperanto, and fill it with the most stubborn,
>unreasonable, uncompromising, ruthless and dishonest people I could find.
>If they choose this path, perhaps the best thing the rest of us can do is
>just to ignore them as an irrelevance to the idea of a planned IL.  After
>all, what they have achieved in 90 years of intolerance is to render Esp
>essentially that: an irrelevance, a nuisance, something of little
>consequence to anyone genuinely interested in facilitating global
>For if there is one thing that we can be sure will not happen in the 
>decades, it is that Esperanto, in its primitive form, with all the
>imperfections as pointed out by theorists and practitioners alike fully
>intact, will be accepted and embraced by a world in need of a universal

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:14:42 -0500, [log in to unmask] wrote:

>Catch a clue!  Nobody wants to hear this crap every time you add a new
>word.  Finish the thing, then let us know when it's done.