On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:32:17 -0500, Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> [ain't Wiktionary great?] > >It is, but Logos seems to be more complete and more accurate though I >like the format of Wiktionary much better. I also have my own >multidictionary that I've been compiling over the years. Someday I may >publish on the web. That is, if I ever find the a free weekend to >devote to it. > Agree! But they sure need to add romanizations!