Je 08.18 atm 2007.01.07, Dana NUTTER skribis
>li [Donald J. HARLOW] mi tulis la
> > Je 06.50 atm 2007.01.07, Dana NUTTER skribis
> > >li [Kjell Rehnström] mi tulis la
> > >
> > > > When I learnt Esperanto, I just did it without any comparing
> > > > it to other
> > > > auxlangs. I didn't even know that there were any others.
> > >
> > >Most people don't know that Esperanto exists either.
> >
> > Actually, most of the people I've run into _do_
> > know that Esperanto exists.
>That's people that YOU have run into.  This needs to be looked at from
>wordwide perspective.  Most people on the planet are uneducated and
>illiterate, so it's not likely they've been exposed to the knowledge
>that E-o exists.

Actually, most people on the planet are neither 
uneducted nor illiterate, these days; most have 
been to school for at least a few years (though 
most don't get the full twelve years that we 
Americans put in), most can read. There may be a 
billion or so people out of the going-on seven 
billion on the planet who don't fall into this 
category, but that's still a minority.

Still, schooling isn't where you hear of 
Esperanto; it's on TV and in the newspapers. For 
instance, every couple of years the Nepalese 
Esperanto Association holds this tourist thing 
where they invite people to come and trek with 
them; a dozen or so usually show up, to wander 
around in the foothills of the Himalayas or 
whatever. Of course, this is a drop in the bucket 
beside the regular tourist groups that come to 
Nepal by the dozens, but it's interesting enough 
because of the nature of the language that it 
will make the Katmandu news, and people there hear of Esperanto in this way.

Esperanto shows up in unlikely places. I once 
drove a Mayan girl from down around Lake Atitlan 
to a hike up by Mt. Tamalpais; she was here 
studying Esperanto in the summer courses at San 
Francisco State University. Philippe Chavignon 
wrote about the village he visited, outside 
Kinshasa in the Congo, where everybody greeted 
him on the street with "Saluton!" and "Bonan 
matenon!" -- which may have been the extent of 
their Esperanto, but they certainly had some idea 
what the language was. I always enjoyed Edmond 
Bordeaux-Szekely's anecdote about the chieftain 
in the Pamir range with whom he tried to 
communicate in four or five languages and finally 
succeeded with Esperanto, because the man had 
once picked up an old Esperanto textbook in a 
bazaar and had studied the language. And, of 
course, there was my wife's tale about her visit 
to Hawai'i in 1991 when Andrzej Grzebowski and 
Earl Galvin were walking through the Polynesian 
Pavilion, talking in Esperanto, and one of the 
dancers on the Marquesas Islands platform 
stopped, listened, and then leaped down in front 
of them and cried out: "C^u vi parolas en Esperanto???"

So I suspect that the number of people who are 
familiar with Esperanto is considerably greater than you believe.

> > (*) They just don't
> > know anything about it except that it's an
> > "artificial language" (with, often, a few
> > additional fantasies added out of their own
> > imagination or out of some comment once made by
> > an equally ignorant columnist in a newspaper).
>I have only seen one small newspaper article about Esperanto (given to
>me by someone), but then again I don't generally mess with newspapers.
>I have seen a couple of references to it on Jeopardy.

Like the Final Jeopardy question at the end of 
November? Apparently the winner won not by 
answering the question correctly (everybody 
answered it correctly!!! [*]), but by his betting strategy ...


(*) I missed it myself, but apparently the final 
jeopardy answer went something like: "In this 
language, spoken by more than a hundred thousand 
people, all nouns end in -O". Everybody answered 
"What is Esperanto?" Not one of them had no idea.

Opinions (in English):
Esperanto (in English):
Literaturo (Esperante):