Well, I live in an area where we have two basic language groups. I have no trouble with the 
Spanish speakers. Just the Americans who speak English only and don't or won't learn 
anything else. And, as I've explained, I talked with a fellow from Morocco who did not speak 
English or Spanish or Occidental, and we both understood each other. You forget, the native 
speaker recognizes that the person he is talking to is not Spanish, or whatever, and they then 
go into a mode of as simple as possible, and begin to mimic the Occidental.

Paul, I respect your opinion on this, however, my actual experience says otherwise. This is 
not just a "claim" without backing. Nor am I the only one who has had this experience. Even if 
in the worst case scenario you can bring up, I can still communicate with more people that 
way than Esperanto ever could, and even English.

And, I'm not saying it works in every case, to not work would in many areas be an exception 
and not the rule.

No matter your opinion Paul, I can go anywhere and do two way communication with other 
language groups which cannot be done with Esperanto under the same conditions as easily, 
if at all.

The difficult one to do this with is the IAL oficionado who either doesn't want to believe it can 
be done, or who ignores over a hundred years of it being done. Just because Occidental 
doesn't have in it what an IAL buff wants does not mean it doesn't work in the real world. It 
does, and by my experience there is not a person on this planet that can dissuade me 
otherwise by speculation. I've done it. And, others have also. I don't speak from singular 
experience, i.e. mine alone. It works as I said and that can't be undone.


On 28 May 2007 at 18:20, Paul Bartlett wrote:

> On Mon, 28 May 2007, auliuniv wrote:
> > [trimmed for conciseness]
> > This is why I prefer Occidental. I don't have to look for
> Occidental
> > speakers to talk with others.
> > For some reason they can't grasp that numbers like that mean
> nothing
> > when one person with Occ can communicate with almost anyone they
> meet
> > within vast areas of the planet. So, in that case, there is no
> need
> > to have thousands or "two million" Occidentalists to visit while
> > touring foreign countries. Is that so hard to grasp?
> I have read similar claims for IALA Interlingua, and I don't think
> that
> the conclusion holds for either language.  Suppose I am in
> northeastern
> Spain and speak in Occidental (or Interlingua) to a Catalonian who
> is
> not an Occidentalist (or Interlinguaist).  She may understand some
> of
> what I am saying, but her recourse, not being an Occidentalist (or
> Interlinguaist), is to reply in Catalan (or Spanish), which I
> probably
> will not understand.  It seems to me that the communication will
> be
> largely one way if only one is the user of the IAL.
> -- 
> Paul Bartlett
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.1/822 - Release Date:
> 5/28/2007 11:40 AM