Print

Print


On 8/13/07, Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Someone on another link pointed this out -- it appears to be a
> language that tries to adhere to what's reconstructed for PIE, but
> with a lot of words taken from more modern languages to fill in
> lexical gaps.
>
> http://www.dnghu.org/

Fascinating! And somebody clearly put a *lot* of work into that.

Cheers,
-- 
Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>