Print

Print


On 8/12/07, Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Someone on another link pointed this out -- it appears to be a
> language that tries to adhere to what's reconstructed for PIE, but
> with a lot of words taken from more modern languages to fill in
> lexical gaps.
>
> http://www.dnghu.org/

Clearly they did not consult Shemspreg
(http://wiki.frath.net/Shemspreg). They could have saved themselves
quite a bit of time and trouble had they done so :-).

It is an interesting project. But it's like watching somebody build a
rocket for a Mars trip in their backyard. You admire their industry
and even their expertise, but you know it's not going anywhere.

Dirk