Print

Print


Wendell Piez wrote:
>  Defenders of XSLT 1.0 will point out that version 1 of the language 
> was probably going to have a hole deeper than any of the others; this 
> just happens to be it. 
I wonder. I'd have said that the inability to process result sets (ie 
what exsl:node-set does)
is a bigger hole. If that had been provided, the grouping problem might 
arise
much less often, as it would be far easier to code.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431