It has been said here, that a useful criteria for an IAL might be:|
> 4. If you do not know a word and do not know its
> morphemes, can you tell if it is an adjective, a
> noun, or a verb? Can you tell if it is a compound
" Do most people in the world even know what an adjective, noun and
" verb are? These are terms used primarily from our model of
" language. Some languages do not have a class of "adjectives" as
" such, but instead use stative verbs or genitive noun constructions.
I do not agree with the latter point. One of the major items of unity
in the world language picture is that the Indo-European Language
group is so vast. And the features mentioned are still common in
that group. Moreover, I have seen no evidence that these "parts-
of speech" present any problem at all to Chinese learners. Semitic
is IMO not all that removed either, nor IMO Indonesian or others.
So I see no reason to fear identifying "nouns," "verbs," "prepositions/
postpositions" and even "adjectives," though the latter might be
fused with adverbs.
If people do not know the grammatical term, that is trivial.
Even two-year olds can have the feel for such things.
That is what is important.
I do, however, agree with the comment below.
Leo J. Moser
[log in to unmask]
--- On Thu 10/25, Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues < [log in to unmask] > wrote:
From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues [mailto: [log in to unmask]]