Print

Print


On 11/2/07, James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Is ofte-n in para 1 a bit of interference from the
> author's L1, or the "accusative" of ofte ?
>

Ah, thanks for spotting that; it's been fixed.  It was late and I didn't
proofread carefully.  Let me know if you see other errors, or poor word
choices.  As you realize, it was an L1 thing.

Todd