On 11/2/07, James Chandler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Is ofte-n in para 1 a bit of interference from the
author's L1, or the "accusative" of ofte ?

Ah, thanks for spotting that; it's been fixed.  It was late and I didn't proofread carefully.  Let me know if you see other errors, or poor word choices.  As you realize, it was an L1 thing.