On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Philip Newton wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 6:00 PM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > In a message dated 11/14/2007 10:08:42 AM Central Standard Time, > > > > [log in to unmask] writes: > > > >To go back to the religion thing: if you > > > >truly believe that everyone who doesn't share your faith is > > > > going to be damned for all eternity, how can you in good > > > > conscience *not* proselytize? > > > > > > I agree. But aren't we getting close to dangerous territory here? > > > > Can you be more specific about "dangerous territory"? > > I interpret it as "no cross, no crown" territory. > One part of this thread is directing into the science vs. religion debate which is Cross; the other part seems to be edging around the ethics of (state) intervention, IMHO, which is Crown. Neither of which is Conlanging. We can always treat the title as a translation exercise :) In Brithenig: Lla yscient es interessant, s'w ngongwenith rhen, gw phodeth ffudergw Now I will have to research to confirm if Brithenig does treat 'fuck off' as a reflexive. It seems to be normal in Romance languages for turning transitive verbs into intransitives. - andrew.