Print

Print


I would vote for that too.

Tim Finney

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:31 -0800, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Conal Tuohy wrote:
> > <date>
> >         <date when="1640" cert="low"/>
> >         <date notBefore="1620" cert="medium"/>
> >         <date notAfter="1660" cert="high"/>
> > </date>
> 
> This seems an elegant and flexible approach to me. It allows refinements 
> like this, too:
> 
> <date>
>          <date when="1640" cert="low"/>
>          <date notBefore="1620" notAfter="1660" cert="medium"/>
> </date>
> 
> where the certainty value applies to the whole date range. I would vote 
> for this being incorporated into the guidelines as good practice.
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
>