Dear Croenen,

The issue you're running into appears to be a problem with the
declaration of <div>
I'm not the best at reading declarations, but <figure> is a member of
model.common while <head> is a member of model.divTop, and any
elements from model.divTop must occur before model.common or they
can't appear at all. So it isn't that <figure> is an alternative to
<head>, exactly, it's that elements from model.divTop can't appear
after any elements from model.common.

Anyway, thinking of it this way the simplest answer might be to add
<figure> to model.divTop in your schema, since this is something that
happens often in your manuscripts. Then <figure> and <head> will be at
the same level, and you'll be able to place your <figure> before


On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Croenen, Godfried
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Lisa and Dot,
> I do agree that in this specific case <figure> is not the correct tag, but the problem remains that the use of <figure> seems too restrictive, and does not alwasy allow one to insert the figure where it physically sits on the page or in the flow of the text.
> I am dealing with medieval manuscripts in which miniatures often appear at the start of chapters, before any headers. Although placing a <figure> there is allowed in P5 or P4, it then excludes the <figure> being followed by a <head> (P5 sees the figure as an alternative to head, as far as I understand). Ideally, I think I would want figure to be allowed anywhere in the <text> (i.e. like milestone elements), but that may be a bit too unrestrictive.
> Godfried
> --
> Dr. Godfried Croenen
> Director of Graduate Studies
> School of Cultures, Languages and Area Studies
> University of Liverpool
> Chatham Street
> Liverpool
> L69 7ZR
> United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)151 794 2763
> Fax: +44 (0)151 794 2357
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Personal webpage:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) public discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dot Porter
> Sent: 14 May 2008 22:26
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: <figure> on first page of letter, annotation after the <closer>
> Hi Lisa,
> Regarding your first question - if you're using P5, rather than using
> the <figure> element you should take a look at 11.1 Digital Facsimiles
> (in the chapter "Representation of Primary Sources):
> This
> section describes various methods for linking page images to the pages
> using the @facs attribute. The most simple method (if you only have
> one image per page) is to indicate the file using @facs on <pb/>:
> <pb facs="page1.jpg"/>
> You can also list all your image files within <facsimile> in your
> header, and point from your <pb/>s to items in that list.
> <facsimile>
>  <graphic xml:id="page1" url="page1.jpg"/>
> </facsimile>
> ...
> <pb facs="#page1"/>
> If you aren't using P5, I encourage you to look into it! In any case,
> <figure> really isn't the tag you want here (I just saw Amanda's
> reply, and she's right that <figure> should be used to note figures or
> illustrations on a page, not the page itself).
> Dot
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Lisa Spiro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> We're running into a couple of problems with a collection of letters that
>> we're marking up.  First, we're trying to include page images at the top of
>> each page using the <figure> element so that readers can easily compare the
>> transcription with images of the original letter.  However, as I read the
>> divTopPart and divWrapper content models, <figure> must come after <opener>
>> and <salute>.  Is there a valid way to place a <figure> immediately after
>> the <div> opens?  Should we be looking at some other solution, or just live
>> with  <figure> appearing after <salute>?
>> Similarly, in several letters the recipient has made annotations after the
>> sender's signature.  One way to treat the annotation would be to mark it as
>> an <add> or <note>, but we get a validation error when we try to put either
>> after <closer>.  We could treat the annotations as a separate <text> (which
>> seems unsatisfactory because the annotations refer to the content of the
>> letter), or we could include <note> or <add> within <closer> (which doesn't
>> reflect the structure of the letter).  What would be the preferred method?
>> Thanks for any help!
>> Lisa
>> --
>> Lisa Spiro, Ph.D.
>> Director, Digital Media Center
>> Fondren Library, Rice University
>> 713-348-2594
> --
> ***************************************
> Dot Porter, University of Kentucky
> #####
> Program Coordinator
> Collaboratory for Research in Computing for Humanities
> Center for Visualization and Virtual Environments
> [log in to unmask] 859-257-1257 x.82115
> ***************************************

Dot Porter, University of Kentucky
Program Coordinator
Collaboratory for Research in Computing for Humanities
Center for Visualization and Virtual Environments
[log in to unmask] 859-257-1257 x.82115