any information anyone might provide about 1) image formats
As Martin mentioned, huge TIFF are usually what people do.
However after reading a well-researched piece on JPEG2000 I am considering changing to this format for some tasks. It certainly would save a lot of space.
The article is at:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july08/buonora/07buonora.html
2) descriptive metadata (whether art historical, photographic, or other--again, in a way that is consistent with professional best practice).
So far we have only experimented with MIX (http://www.loc.gov/standards/mix/
) which is a rather technical Niso standard. It encodes all things about the image file someone might want to know but does not provide fields for the description of the content. There are other minor problems with it, but it is relatively new and there is still space to grow.
In order to package everything neatly together it seems we have to use METS (http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
). We haven't implemented it yet, but it is high on my agenda for this autumn, since we have accumulated a lot of scans of woodblock prints, and want to combine them with full-text and translations TEI files.
It allows to combine pointers to your various image files, TEI description and MIX techdata into one intelligible whole. The idea is to package various digital objects together to give digital librarians a handle. Last time I looked METS files can include complete TEI headers and MIX files. In that case it will be difficult to validate the package completely, but with NVDL even that might be possible now. And using already existing metadata chunks makes good sense.
I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has used METS to archive projects which involved a TEI text.
all the best
Dr. Marcus Bingenheimer 馬德偉
Director, Library and Information Center 圖書資訊館館長
Dharma Drum Buddhist College 法鼓佛教研修學院 (DDBC)
No. 2-6 Xishihu, Jinshan 20842, Taipei County, Taiwan, R.O.C.
台灣，20842台北縣金山鄉西勢湖2-6號 Tel: +886-2-2498-7171 # 2381http://buddhistinformatics.ddbc.edu.tw/~mb/