Hi Laurent,

Laurent Romary wrote:
> I have been using (perhaps abusively) <revisionDesc> to record the 
> publication stages of a journal paper. How do you feel with:
> <revisionDesc>
> <change when="2007-11-22">Submitted</change>
> <change when="2008-11-04">Revised</change>
> <change when="2009-02-17">Accepted</change>
> </revisionDesc>

The problem with this is that most of us have more detailed revision 
information cataloguing lots of changes in the <revisionDesc>, and these 
don't necessarily intersect with the document status. I don't much care 
when the document changed from proofing to published; but I do care when 
(possibly after publication) an erratum was corrected. I think on 
reflection that the revisionDesc is actually not the place for the 
document status.


Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
([log in to unmask])
Half-Baked Software, Inc.
([log in to unmask])
[log in to unmask]