Print

Print


On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 16:59 -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:

> While <ch> for /tS/ and <sh> for /S/ are
> unobjectionable, it's hard to say the same about <gh> for /dZ/, <hh>
> for /x/, <jh> for /Z/.

Purquì? S' iscrivi "gh" pur /ǰ/ in Liburnes — no teni nigỳn disavantagh.