Print

Print


Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:31 AM, David McCann<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Purquì? S' iscrivi "gh" pur /ǰ/ in Liburnes — no teni nigỳn disavantagh.
> 
> It's just a convention thing.  I'm used to seeing the spelling "gh"
> used to explicitly mark a <g> as "hard" (that is, [g]) where a bare
> <g> might possibly be interpreted as "soft" ([dZ]).  So using <gh> to
> *mean* [dZ] feels exactly backwards to me.
> 
> The other common use for <gh> is of course for [G].

So far Deini is the only conlang I have with /G/.  The Deini 
letter is romanized as <q>.